Skip to main content
McMaster University
DeGroote School of Business
McMaster University
Search

DSB Main Website Search

McMaster Menu
DeGroote Menu
  • Home
  • Programs
  • About
    • About DeGroote
    • Our Leadership
    • Dean’s Corner
    • Our Faculty & Research  
    • McLean Centre for Collaborative Discovery
    • Strategic Plan 
    • Annual Report 
  • Events
  • Students
    • Student Resources
    • Student Clubs
    • Submit a Student Bulletin
    • Submit your Event
  • Alumni
    • Alumni Resources
    • Wayne C. Fox Distinguished Alumni Award 
    • DeGroote Alumni Social Impact Award
  • Staff
  • Give
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • DeGroote Directory
Search McMaster Menu
  • Home
  • Programs
  • About
    About DeGrooteOur LeadershipDean’s CornerOur Faculty & Research  McLean Centre for Collaborative DiscoveryStrategic Plan Annual Report 
  • Events
  • Students
    Student ResourcesStudent ClubsSubmit a Student BulletinSubmit your Event
  • Alumni
    Alumni ResourcesWayne C. Fox Distinguished Alumni Award DeGroote Alumni Social Impact Award
  • Staff
  • Give
  • Contact
    Contact UsDeGroote Directory

RESEARCH   STAFF  

In the News: Many of us welcome working from home, but universities show its dangers for women’s careers

March 15, 2022 ·

Contributed by: Mojan Naisani Samani

Share

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn Mail Copy Link
A woman working at home at her desk with a laptop while a small child jumps on the couch in the background.

If one possibly positive thing came out of the COVID-19 pandemic, it was the impetus it gave to letting people work from home.

Many see working from home as benefiting women workers. The logic is they can combine a career with the responsibilities of looking after children. But not enough thought has been given to how this could make things worse, not better, for many women.

We wanted to know how working from home during the pandemic affected men and women, including their productivity at work. We surveyed 11,288 people working in 14 universities across Canada and Australia, including 3,480 academics.

Our interest was sparked by an early observation by an editor of a British scholarly journal that journal submissions by women academics had fallen significantly.

This observation has been confirmed by several systematic studies that show declines in research outputs by women academics.

What did the study find?

Our own study of academic staff in the survey showed the same thing. Indeed, this difference in opportunities to submit research for publication was the biggest difference between the experiences of men and women during pandemic-induced lockdowns.

Women ended up facing increased teaching loads and doing more administration work more often than men. Women were also more likely than men to spend less time on research.

Multi-bar graph illustrating women's reduced time in research and fieldwork, contrasted with increased teaching and administrative duties compared to men.

Experiences of academics in Australia and Canada as a result of the changes associated with moving from pre-Covid to Covid work. Author provided

But the gender differences for these tasks were not as large as those in applying for research funding or submitting articles to peer-reviewed journals. These are the measures by which academic careers stand or fall these days.

What seems to be happening is that both men and women were forced to do more of their research at home. The difference was that women had less chance than men to put in the sustained time to produce good, publishable research. In our study, especially when children were around, women had more difficulty finding the vital “thinking time” needed for good research.

Ideally, men would assume an equal share of domestic responsibilities when working from home. But that hasn’t happened.

A woman engages with her laptop on the couch, as a small child beside her attempts to capture her focus.Both men and women had to do more of their research at home. The difference was that other responsibilities claimed more of women’s thinking time.

The future looks worse

Without confronting the problem head-on, universities are likely to make the problem worse.

We found most university staff want to work from home more than they were allowed before the pandemic.

Women tended to want more of this than men. That would, however, make them less visible in the physical office. And that, in turn, could reduce their perceived productivity.

Many universities can see the work-from-home trend as providing opportunities to save money. They can do this by getting rid of private offices and shifting academics into shared spaces. It’s a trend that started before the pandemic.

But when academics are on campus, a private office, not a shared space, is needed to do online teaching or research that requires thinking time.

Moreover, universities are increasingly tempted to reduce academics’ access to sabbaticals. Historically, these periods of study leave have been the best chance to find the thinking time to do good research. Now, though, it’s becoming less of an “entitlement” and more of a “privilege”, available to fewer researchers each year.

As sabbaticals become less available, women will find it much harder than men to make up for the lack of sustained thinking time. Their real productivity would be lower than men’s.

It’s the same for many white-collar workers as well

What we’ve described isn’t just a problem for academics. It’s a problem in any white-collar occupation in which “knowledge work” is performed.

In many jobs sustained knowledge work — that is, work involving long periods of concentration, and hence a good amount of thinking time — is needed to develop the best ideas. Most managerial jobs, and many professional and administrative jobs, involve and require some periods of sustained knowledge work.

But especially since the pandemic, both in the public and private sector, most staff want to be able to work from home some of the time. This is not just a pandemic phenomenon. Workers genuinely like not having to spend hours commuting every day.

Employers, too, now figure employees can be just as, if not more, productive at home. Employers are already taking advantage of “hybrid working”. They are putting more people into “hot desks” or other co-working spaces to reduce physical office costs.

That might sound fine, until you realise that the opportunities for, and the outcomes of, sustained knowledge work — the stuff that will get you recognised and promoted — will be gendered. It will be harder for women than men to schedule in the necessary thinking time, especially at home.

Where to from here?

Many of the slow advances women have made in some knowledge work occupations in recent times may be lost if they have less opportunity to get the sustained thinking time that translates into performance.

If women are to have a fair go in white-collar jobs in the future, then employers will need to rethink their post-pandemic strategies for saving money. Shared spaces may be good for the accommodation budget, but they’re not so good for the individuals concerned or for their contribution to organisational productivity.

Where unions represent those workers, they need to resist the closure of office facilities that can be critical for sustained knowledge work.

Governments need to be more active in supporting widespread, affordable, accessible, quality childcare.

Much has been written about how the economic response during the pandemic disadvantaged women. But worse may follow. We need to design to offset, not to compound, the problems that could come from more working from home.The Conversation

 

Authors: David Peetz, Professor Emeritus, Griffith Business School, Griffith University; Kim Southey, Senior Lecturer in Management, University of Southern Queensland; Marian Baird, Professor of Employment Relations, University of Sydney; Mojan Naisani Samani, PhD Candidate, DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University; Rae Cooper, Professor of Gender, Work and Employment Relations, ARC Future Fellow, Business School, co-Director Women, Work and Leadership Research Group, University of Sydney; Sara Charlesworth, Professor, School of Management, RMIT University; Shelagh Campbell, Associate Professor, Ethics and Labour Relations, University of Regina, and Susan Ressia, Senior Lecturer, Employment Relations, Griffith University

 

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Tags:   EMPLOYMENT IN THE NEWS MOJAN NAISANI SAMANI PANDEMIC PHD RESEARCH WOMEN WORK FROM HOME

Related Stories

From research to impact: DeGroote undergraduate student research day  
August 20, 2025 · RESEARCH · STRATEGIC PLAN | RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP · STUDENT

From research to impact: DeGroote undergraduate student research day  

Breaking financial barriers: New learning hub explores solutions to address financial exclusion
July 25, 2025 · MCCD · SOCIETAL IMPACT · STRATEGIC PLAN | ENGAGING COMMUNITIES

Breaking financial barriers: New learning hub explores solutions to address financial exclusion

Breaking down academic silos
June 25, 2025 · HUMAN RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT · RESEARCH · SOCIETAL IMPACT · STRATEGIC PLAN | RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP

Breaking down academic silos

Pursuing doctorates together: A story of academic partnership 
June 18, 2025 · INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Pursuing doctorates together: A story of academic partnership 

The Case for Creative Risk-Taking, Even When the Stakes Are High
May 28, 2025 · STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT

The Case for Creative Risk-Taking, Even When the Stakes Are High

New McMaster research centre tackles the future of work
April 10, 2025 · RESEARCH · SOCIETAL IMPACT · STRATEGIC PLAN | RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP · HUMAN RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT

New McMaster research centre tackles the future of work

Shaping workplace policy through the lens of equity
March 18, 2025 · HUMAN RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT · STRATEGIC PLAN | RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP

Shaping workplace policy through the lens of equity

Tariffs and Canadian jobs: Q&A with expert Catherine Connelly
February 25, 2025 · HUMAN RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT · STRATEGIC PLAN | RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP

Tariffs and Canadian jobs: Q&A with expert Catherine Connelly

In the news: $4.1 million fines for violations of Canada’s temporary foreign worker program are a ‘drop in the bucket’
January 22, 2025 · HUMAN RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT · RESEARCH

In the news: $4.1 million fines for violations of Canada’s temporary foreign worker program are a ‘drop in the bucket’

The future of healthcare: Mike Heenan on trends and disruptions
January 22, 2025 · STRATEGIC PLAN | ENGAGING COMMUNITIES · ALUMNI · HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT

The future of healthcare: Mike Heenan on trends and disruptions

People-focused leadership: Insights from Mike Heenan
January 9, 2025 · STRATEGIC PLAN | ENGAGING COMMUNITIES · ALUMNI

People-focused leadership: Insights from Mike Heenan

In the news: The strike is over – now what?
January 9, 2025 · HUMAN RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT

In the news: The strike is over – now what?

Student perspective: Driving sustainability in freight transportation
December 11, 2024 · OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT · STUDENT

Student perspective: Driving sustainability in freight transportation

Grad students pitch impactful ideas to drive real change
December 4, 2024 · STUDENT · RESEARCH · OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT · SOCIETAL IMPACT

Grad students pitch impactful ideas to drive real change

The heart of supervision: How Manish Verma shapes future leaders
December 3, 2024 · OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT · RESEARCH · STRATEGIC PLAN | RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP

The heart of supervision: How Manish Verma shapes future leaders

DeGroote School of Business DeGroote School of Business Logo
DeGroote Instagram logo DeGroote Linkedin logo DeGroote Facebook logo DeGroote YouTube Logo DeGroote TikTok Logo
DeGroote Menu

  • Programs
  • About DeGroote
  • Events
  • Student Resources
  • Staff Resources
  • Alumni Resources
  • Give
  • DeGroote Directory
  • Contact Us
  • Faculty & Research  
Hamilton Campus

DeGroote School of Business
McMaster University

1280 Main Street West

Hamilton, Ontario
L8S 4M4
Burlington Campus

DeGroote School of Business
Ron Joyce Centre

4350 South Service Road

Burlington, Ontario
L7L 5R8
AACSB Logo

McMaster University is committed to providing websites that are accessible to the widest possible audience.  

If you require any content on this website in an alternate format, please contact dsbweb@mcmaster.ca and we will respond promptly.

DeGroote Online Privacy Policy

McMaster Brighter World Logo McMaster University - Brighter World Logo
Contact McMaster McMaster Terms & Conditions McMaster Privacy Policy
Secret Link